On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:48:56PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:07:35PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: > >Please order this patch and PATCH[5] because EEH device is expected to >be created before EEH PE. > >>EEH on powerpc platform needs eeh_dev structure to track the pci device > ^^^ > PCI > >>status. Since VFs are created/released dynamically, VF's eeh_dev is also >>dynamically created/released in system. >> >>This patch creates/removes eeh_dev when pci_dn is created/removed for VFs, >>and marks it with EEH_DEV_VF type. >> >>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>--- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 7 +++++++ >> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 4 ++++ >> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_dev.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 7 +++++++ >> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+) >> >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>index 56e8cd9..2067de4 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>@@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ static inline bool eeh_pe_passed(struct eeh_pe *pe) >> #define EEH_DEV_NO_HANDLER (1 << 8) /* No error handler */ >> #define EEH_DEV_SYSFS (1 << 9) /* Sysfs created */ >> #define EEH_DEV_REMOVED (1 << 10) /* Removed permanently */ >>+#define EEH_DEV_VF (1 << 11) /* VF port */ >> > >Why you need this flag? I guess "edev->physfn" can be used to distinguish >it's a normal or VF eeh_dev. > Just like we have EEH_DEV_BRIDGE and EEH_DEV_DS_PORT, I use the flag EEH_DEV_VF to mark it a VF eeh_dev. -- Richard Yang Help you, Help me -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
