On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/04/15 13:37, Duc Dang wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 17/04/15 11:00, Duc Dang wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:20:19 +0100
>>>>> Duc Dang <dhdang@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2015-04-11 00:42, Duc Dang wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Marc Zyngier
>>>>>>>> <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/04/15 18:05, Duc Dang wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> X-Gene v1 SoC supports total 2688 MSI/MSIX vectors coalesced into
>>>>>>>>>> 16 HW IRQ lines.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 6 +
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c | 407
>>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c | 21 ++
>>>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 435 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> index 7b892a9..c9b61fa 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -89,11 +89,17 @@ config PCI_XGENE
>>>>>>>>>> depends on ARCH_XGENE
>>>>>>>>>> depends on OF
>>>>>>>>>> select PCIEPORTBUS
>>>>>>>>>> + select PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN if PCI_MSI
>>>>>>>>>> + select PCI_XGENE_MSI if PCI_MSI
>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>> Say Y here if you want internal PCI support on APM
>>>>>>>>>> X-Gene SoC. There are 5 internal PCIe ports available. Each port
>>>>>>>>>> is GEN3 capable
>>>>>>>>>> and have varied lanes from x1 to x8.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +config PCI_XGENE_MSI
>>>>>>>>>> + bool "X-Gene v1 PCIe MSI feature"
>>>>>>>>>> + depends on PCI_XGENE && PCI_MSI
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> config PCI_LAYERSCAPE
>>>>>>>>>> bool "Freescale Layerscape PCIe controller"
>>>>>>>>>> depends on OF && ARM
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile index e61d91c..f39bde3 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -11,5 +11,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_SPEAR13XX) +=
>>>>>>>>>> pcie-spear13xx.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE) += pci-keystone-dw.o
>>>>>>>>>> pci-keystone.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX) += pcie-xilinx.o
>>>>>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XGENE) += pci-xgene.o
>>>>>>>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XGENE_MSI) += pci-xgene-msi.o
>>>>>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE) += pci-layerscape.o
>>>>>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_VERSATILE) += pci-versatile.o
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
>>>>>>>>>> b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
>>>>>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>>>> index 0000000..4f0ff42
>>>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene-msi.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,407 @@
>>>>>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>>>>>> + * APM X-Gene MSI Driver
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2014, Applied Micro Circuits Corporation
>>>>>>>>>> + * Author: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> + * Duc Dang <dhdang@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it
>>>>>>>>>> and/or modify it
>>>>>>>>>> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>>>>>>>>>> published by the
>>>>>>>>>> + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License,
>>>>>>>>>> or (at your
>>>>>>>>>> + * option) any later version.
>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be
>>>>>>>>>> useful,
>>>>>>>>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>>>>>>>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/msi.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +#define MSI_INDEX0 0x000000
>>>>>>>>>> +#define MSI_INT0 0x800000
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +struct xgene_msi_settings {
>>>>>>>>>> + u32 index_per_group;
>>>>>>>>>> + u32 irqs_per_index;
>>>>>>>>>> + u32 nr_msi_vec;
>>>>>>>>>> + u32 nr_hw_irqs;
>>>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +struct xgene_msi {
>>>>>>>>>> + struct device_node *node;
>>>>>>>>>> + struct msi_controller mchip;
>>>>>>>>>> + struct irq_domain *domain;
>>>>>>>>>> + struct xgene_msi_settings *settings;
>>>>>>>>>> + u32 msi_addr_lo;
>>>>>>>>>> + u32 msi_addr_hi;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd rather see the mailbox address directly, and only do the
>>>>>>>>> split when assigning it to the message (you seem to play all kind
>>>>>>>>> of tricks on the address anyway).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> msi_addr_lo and msi_addr_hi store the physical base address of MSI
>>>>>>>> controller registers. I will add comment to clarify this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I mean is that there is no point in keeping this around as a
>>>>>>> pair of 32bit variables. You'd better keep it as a single 64bit,
>>>>>>> and do the split when assigning it the the MSI message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Marc,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These came from device-tree (which describes 64-bit address number as
>>>>>> 2 32-bit words).
>>>>>
>>>>> ... and converted to a resource as a 64bit word, on which you apply
>>>>> {upper,lower}_32_bit(). So much for DT...
>>>>>
>>>>>> If I store them this way, I don't need CPU cycles to do the split
>>>>>> every time assigning them to the MSI message. Please let me know what
>>>>>> do you think about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is getting absolutely silly.
>>>>>
>>>>> How many cycles does it take to execute "lsr x1, x0, #32" on X-Gene? If
>>>>> it takes so long that it is considered to be a bottleneck, I suggest
>>>>> you go and design a better CPU (hint: the answer is probably 1 cycle
>>>>> absolutely everywhere).
>>>>>
>>>>> How often are you configuring MSIs in the face of what is happening in
>>>>> the rest of the kernel? Almost never!
>>>>>
>>>>> So, given that "never" times 1 is still never, I'll consider that
>>>>> readability of the code trumps it anytime (I can't believe we're having
>>>>> that kind of conversation...).
>>>>>
>>>> I changed to use u64 for msi_addr and split it when composing MSI messages.
>>>> The change is in v4 of the patch set that I just posted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +static int xgene_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
>>>>>>>>>> + const struct cpumask *mask,
>>>>>>>>>> bool force)
>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>> + struct xgene_msi *msi =
>>>>>>>>>> irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(irq_data);
>>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int gic_irq;
>>>>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> + gic_irq = msi->msi_virqs[irq_data->hwirq %
>>>>>>>>>> msi->settings->nr_hw_irqs];
>>>>>>>>>> + ret = irq_set_affinity(gic_irq, mask);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Erm... This as the effect of moving *all* the MSIs hanging off
>>>>>>>>> this interrupt to another CPU. I'm not sure that's an acceptable
>>>>>>>>> effect... What if another MSI requires a different affinity?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We have 16 'real' hardware IRQs. Each of these has multiple MSIs
>>>>>>>> attached to it.
>>>>>>>> So this will move all MSIs handing off this interrupt to another
>>>>>>>> CPU; and we don't support different affinity settings for
>>>>>>>> different MSIs that are attached to the same hardware IRQ.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, that's a significant departure from the expected behaviour.
>>>>>>> In other words, I wonder how useful this is. Could you instead
>>>>>>> reconfigure the MSI itself to hit the right CPU (assuming you don't
>>>>>>> have more than 16 CPUs and if
>>>>>>> that's only for XGene-1, this will only be 8 at most)? This would
>>>>>>> reduce your number of possible MSIs, but at least the semantics of
>>>>>>> set_afinity would be preserved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> X-Gene-1 supports 2688 MSIs that are divided into 16 groups, each
>>>>>> group has 168 MSIs that are mapped to 1 hardware GIC IRQ (so we have
>>>>>> 16 hardware GIC IRQs for 2688 MSIs).
>>>>>
>>>>> We've already established that.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Setting affinity of single MSI to deliver it to a target CPU will move
>>>>>> all the MSIs mapped to the same GIC IRQ to that CPU as well. This is
>>>>>> not a standard behavior, but limiting the total number of MSIs will
>>>>>> cause a lot of devices to fall back to INTx (with huge performance
>>>>>> penalty) or even fail to load their driver as these devices request
>>>>>> more than 16 MSIs during driver initialization.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I think you got it wrong. If you have 168 MSIs per GIC IRQ, and
>>>>> provided that you have 8 CPUs (XGene-1), you end up with 336 MSIs per
>>>>> CPU (having statically assigned 2 IRQs per CPU).
>>>>>
>>>>> Assuming you adopt my scheme, you still have a grand total of 336 MSIs
>>>>> that can be freely moved around without breaking any userspace
>>>>> expectations.
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks Marc. This is a very good idea.
>>>>
>>>> But to move MSIs around, I need to change MSI termination address and data
>>>> and write them to device configuration space. This may cause problems
>>>> if the device
>>>> fires an interrupt at the same time when I do the config write?
>>>>
>>>> What is your opinion here?
>>>
>>> There is an inherent race when changing the affinity of any interrupt,
>>> whether that's an MSI or not. The kernel is perfectly prepared to handle
>>> such a situation (to be honest, the kernel doesn't really care).
>>>
>>> The write to the config space shouldn't be a concern. You will either
>>> hit the old *or* the new CPU, but that race is only during the write
>>> itself (you can read back from the config space if you're really
>>> paranoid). By the time you return from this read/write, the device will
>>> be reconfigured.
>>>
>>>>> I think that 336 MSIs is a fair number (nowhere near the 16 you claim).
>>>>> Most platforms are doing quite well with that kind of numbers. Also,
>>>>> you don't have to allocate all the MSIs a device can possibly claim (up
>>>>> to 2048 MSI-X per device), as they are all perfectly capable of using
>>>>> less MSI without having to fallback to INTx).
>>>>>
>>>>>> I can document the limitation in affinity setting of X-Gene-1 MSI in
>>>>>> the driver to hopefully not make people surprise and hope to keep the
>>>>>> total number of supported MSI as 2688 so that we can support as many
>>>>>> cards that require MSI/MSI-X as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think this is a valid approach. This breaks userspace (think of
>>>>> things like irqbalance), and breaks the SMP affinity model that Linux
>>>>> uses. No amount of documentation is going to solve it, so I think you
>>>>> just have to admit that the HW is mis-designed and do the best you can
>>>>> to make it work like Linux expect it to work.
>>>>>
>>>>> The alternative would to disable affinity setting altogether instead of
>>>>> introducing these horrible side effects.
>>>>>
>>>> I have it disabled (set_affinity does nothing) in my v4 patch.
>>>
>>> It would be good if you could try the above approach. It shouldn't be
>>> hard to write, and it would be a lot better than just ignoring the problem.
>>>
>> Yes. I am working on this change.
>
> In which case, I'll wait for a v5. No need to spend time on something
> that is going to change anyway.
Marc:
Is it possible to use the pci_msi_create_default_irq_domain for the X-Gene MSI
driver. Or is this going to be removed in the future. Thanks
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
