On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 06:33:08PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Allows to properly set up multiple MSI irqs per device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> The ifdef is needed to avoid a compile error on
> !CONFIG_PCI_MSI, as msi_list is only part of pci_dev
> when the kernel is compiled with MSI support.
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index 1f4ea6f2d910..8a15ea2e8eab 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -269,6 +269,9 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
> }
>
> *pos = pos0;
> + desc->nvec_used = no_irqs;
> + desc->msi_attrib.multiple = order_base_2(no_irqs);
> +
> return irq;
>
> no_valid_irq:
> @@ -305,6 +308,48 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> +static int dw_msi_setup_irqs(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + int nvec, int type)
> +{
> + int irq, pos;
> + struct msi_desc *desc;
> + struct msi_msg msg;
> + struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
> +
> + /* MSI-X interrupts are not supported */
> + if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!list_is_singular(&pdev->msi_list));
> + desc = list_entry(pdev->msi_list.next, struct msi_desc, list);
> +
> + irq = assign_irq(nvec, desc, &pos);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return irq;
> +
> + if (pp->ops->get_msi_addr)
> + msg.address_lo = pp->ops->get_msi_addr(pp);
> + else
> + msg.address_lo = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
> + msg.address_hi = 0x0;
> +
> + if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
> + msg.data = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp, pos);
> + else
> + msg.data = pos;
> +
> + pci_write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +static int dw_msi_setup_irqs(struct msi_chip *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + int nvec, int type)
> +{
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +#endif
I think it would be better to have the #ifdef inside the function to avoid
the error that occurred here, where the function prototype is different
between the CONFIG_PCI_MSI enabled and disabled definitions ("struct
msi_controller *" vs. "struct msi_chip *").
>
> static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
> {
> @@ -317,6 +362,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
>
> static struct msi_controller dw_pcie_msi_chip = {
> .setup_irq = dw_msi_setup_irq,
> + .setup_irqs = dw_msi_setup_irqs,
> .teardown_irq = dw_msi_teardown_irq,
> };
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
