On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We should pass pci_bus * instead of pci_dev * to pci_domain_nr(). > > Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> I think this seems correct, at least in terms of fixing a build issue. But it changes some behavior too. It would be nice to have confirmation that the change *fixes* something rather than breaking something. It looks like this code has been this way since 6f09a9250a5d ("Altix: ACPI SSDT PCI device support") in 2007. So if it really is broken without this fix, it seems strange that we wouldn't have noticed until now. Tony, since I can't test this, and the rest of Yijing's PCI series doesn't depend on this, do you want to take care of this? You can drop my Signed-off-by in that case. Bjorn > --- > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c | 6 +++--- > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c > index 0640739..2fd7414 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c > +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c > @@ -364,12 +364,12 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, > status = acpi_evaluate_integer(rootbus_handle, METHOD_NAME__SEG, NULL, > &segment); > if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { > - if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev)) { > + if (segment != pci_domain_nr(dev->bus)) { > acpi_get_name(rootbus_handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, > &name_buffer); > printk(KERN_ERR > "%s: Segment number mismatch, 0x%llx vs 0x%x for: %s\n", > - __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev), > + __func__, segment, pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), > (char *)name_buffer.pointer); > kfree(name_buffer.pointer); > return 1; > @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ sn_acpi_get_pcidev_info(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pcidev_info **pcidev_info, > /* Build up the pcidev_info.pdi_slot_host_handle */ > host_devfn = get_host_devfn(pcidev_match.handle, rootbus_handle); > (*pcidev_info)->pdi_slot_host_handle = > - ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev) << 40) | > + ((unsigned long) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) << 40) | > /* bus == 0 */ > host_devfn; > return 0; > diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c > index 55776df..19506a5 100644 > --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c > +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_init.c > @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ sn_io_slot_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev) > panic("%s: Unable to alloc memory for sn_irq_info", __func__); > > /* Call to retrieve pci device information needed by kernel. */ > - status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev), > + status = sal_get_pcidev_info((u64) pci_domain_nr(dev->bus), > (u64) dev->bus->number, > dev->devfn, > (u64) __pa(pcidev_info), > -- > 1.7.1 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html