On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:40:05PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:12:19PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > In order to be able to populate the device msi_domain field,
> > add the necesary hooks to propagate the PHB msi_domain across
> > secondary busses to devices.
> >
> > So far, nobody populates the initial msi_domain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/probe.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index c8ca98c..d1009a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -670,6 +670,20 @@ static void pci_set_bus_speed(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +void __weak pcibios_set_phb_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>
> We haven't previously used the "phb" abbreviation in the PCI core, so I'd
> rather not start now. I'm not really sure how relevant it is anyway --
> maybe the name doesn't need to include a reference to the host bridge at
> all?
Sorry, I meant to reply to the v2 patch, not the old one. But I think the
comment still applies there.
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pci_set_bus_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *bridge = bus->self;
> > +
> > + if (!bridge)
> > + pcibios_set_phb_msi_domain(bus);
> > + else
> > + dev_set_msi_domain(&bus->dev, dev_get_msi_domain(&bridge->dev));
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
> > struct pci_dev *bridge, int busnr)
> > {
> > @@ -723,6 +737,7 @@ static struct pci_bus *pci_alloc_child_bus(struct pci_bus *parent,
> > bridge->subordinate = child;
> >
> > add_dev:
> > + pci_set_bus_msi_domain(child);
> > ret = device_register(&child->dev);
> > WARN_ON(ret < 0);
> >
> > @@ -1517,6 +1532,11 @@ static void pci_init_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > pci_enable_acs(dev);
> > }
> >
> > +static void pci_set_msi_domain(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + dev_set_msi_domain(&dev->dev, dev_get_msi_domain(&dev->bus->dev));
> > +}
> > +
> > void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > @@ -1546,6 +1566,9 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
> > /* Initialize various capabilities */
> > pci_init_capabilities(dev);
> >
> > + /* Setup MSI irq domain */
>
> This is *really* a nitpick, but "setup" suggests that we're doing more than
> just setting a pointer, i.e., it suggests that we're doing something more
> involved to get it all ready for use. But here, I think we really are just
> setting a pointer, so I think the comment is pointless since the function
> name already says that.
>
> > + pci_set_msi_domain(dev);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Add the device to our list of discovered devices
> > * and the bus list for fixup functions, etc.
> > @@ -1947,6 +1970,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> > b->bridge = get_device(&bridge->dev);
> > device_enable_async_suspend(b->bridge);
> > pci_set_bus_of_node(b);
> > + pci_set_bus_msi_domain(b);
> >
> > if (!parent)
> > set_dev_node(b->bridge, pcibus_to_node(b));
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index a523cee..3266764 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -1637,6 +1637,7 @@ int pcibios_set_pcie_reset_state(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > void pcibios_release_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
> > void pcibios_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active);
> > +void pcibios_set_phb_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus);
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATE_CALLBACKS
> > extern struct dev_pm_ops pcibios_pm_ops;
> > --
> > 2.1.3
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
