On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 10:24 -0800, Rajat Jain wrote: > One of the reasons to replace the condition (*l == 0xffff0001) with > (*l & 0xffff) == 0x0001) was that some devices apparently returned > 0001 for device id to indicate CRS, but returned actual vendor id in > the vendor ID field (hence the need to ignore vendor field). > > Are we saying that the tg3 device returns 0x0001 for the device ID and > yet expects it to be treated as a good value (not CRS)? > No it should not be treated as a good value, this commit has surfaced/exposed a problem in 5722 chipset which was previously masked. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
