Re: [PATCH] PCI: designware: Add support 4 ATUs assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lucas,

Thanks for your comments.
Please see my reply inline.

Thanks,
Minghuan

On 2014年11月10日 20:00, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.11.2014, 18:43 +0800 schrieb Minghuan Lian:
Currently, pcie-designware.c only supports two ATUs, ATU0 is used
for CFG0 and MEM, ATU1 is used for CFG1 and IO. There is a conflict
when MEM and CFG0 are accessed simultaneously. The patch adds
'num-atus' property to PCIe dts node to describe the number of
PCIe controller's ATUs. If num_atus is bigger than or equal to 4,
we will change ATUs assignment: ATU0 for CFG0, ATU1 for CFG1,
ATU2 for MEM, ATU3 for IO.

Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt    |  1 +
  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c                 | 48 ++++++++++++++++------
  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h                 |  5 +++
  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
index 9f4faa8..500796e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt
@@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ Optional properties:
  - bus-range: PCI bus numbers covered (it is recommended for new devicetrees to
    specify this property, to keep backwards compatibility a range of 0x00-0xff
    is assumed if not present)
+- num-atus: number of ATUs
This lacks documentation for the default value if not present.
[Minghuan] I will add default value
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
index dfed00a..b872dd0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
  #define PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT		0x900
  #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND		(0x1 << 31)
  #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND	(0x0 << 31)
+#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX3		(0x3 << 0)
+#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX2		(0x2 << 0)
  #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1		(0x1 << 0)
  #define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0		(0x0 << 0)
  #define PCIE_ATU_CR1			0x904
@@ -346,7 +348,7 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
  	struct of_pci_range range;
  	struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
  	struct resource *cfg_res;
-	u32 val, na, ns;
+	u32 num_atus, val, na, ns;
  	const __be32 *addrp;
  	int i, index, ret;
@@ -486,6 +488,18 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
  		}
  	}
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-atus", &num_atus))
+		num_atus = 2;
You don't need this check. Just initialize num_atus to 2,
of_property_read_u32() won't touch the value if the property isn't
found.
[Minghuan] Ok, I will change it.
+	if (num_atus >= 4) {
+		pp->atu_cfg0_idx = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
+		pp->atu_cfg1_idx = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
+		pp->atu_mem_idx = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX2;
+		pp->atu_io_idx = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX3;
+	} else {
+		pp->atu_cfg0_idx = pp->atu_mem_idx = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
+		pp->atu_cfg1_idx = pp->atu_io_idx = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
+	}
+
  	if (pp->ops->host_init)
  		pp->ops->host_init(pp);
@@ -511,8 +525,8 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
  {
-	/* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : CFG0 */
-	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0,
+	/* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : CFG0 */
+	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_cfg0_idx,
  			  PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->cfg0_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, (pp->cfg0_mod_base >> 32), PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
@@ -526,8 +540,8 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
  {
-	/* Program viewport 1 : OUTBOUND : CFG1 */
-	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1,
+	/* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : CFG1 */
+	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_cfg1_idx,
  			  PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->cfg1_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
@@ -541,8 +555,8 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
  {
-	/* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : MEM */
-	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0,
+	/* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : MEM */
+	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_mem_idx,
  			  PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->mem_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
@@ -557,8 +571,8 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
static void dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
  {
-	/* Program viewport 1 : OUTBOUND : IO */
-	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1,
+	/* Program viewport : OUTBOUND : IO */
+	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | pp->atu_io_idx,
  			  PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
  	dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, pp->io_mod_base, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
@@ -585,12 +599,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
  		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(pp, busdev);
  		ret = dw_pcie_cfg_read(pp->va_cfg0_base + address, where, size,
  				val);
-		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
+		if (pp->atu_mem_idx == pp->atu_cfg0_idx)
+			dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
  	} else {
  		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(pp, busdev);
  		ret = dw_pcie_cfg_read(pp->va_cfg1_base + address, where, size,
  				val);
-		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
+		if (pp->atu_io_idx == pp->atu_cfg1_idx)
+			dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
  	}
return ret;
@@ -610,12 +626,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_wr_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
  		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(pp, busdev);
  		ret = dw_pcie_cfg_write(pp->va_cfg0_base + address, where, size,
  				val);
-		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
+		if (pp->atu_mem_idx == pp->atu_cfg0_idx)
+			dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
  	} else {
  		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(pp, busdev);
  		ret = dw_pcie_cfg_write(pp->va_cfg1_base + address, where, size,
  				val);
-		dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
+		if (pp->atu_io_idx == pp->atu_cfg1_idx)
+			dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
  	}
return ret;
@@ -770,6 +788,10 @@ void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
  	u32 membase;
  	u32 memlimit;
+ /* set ATUs setting for MEM and IO */
+	dw_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
+	dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
+
  	/* set the number of lanes */
  	dw_pcie_readl_rc(pp, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, &val);
  	val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
index c625675..404f601 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ struct pcie_port {
  	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
  	unsigned long		msi_data;
  	DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS);
+	/* ATUs setting */
+	u8			atu_cfg0_idx;
+	u8			atu_cfg1_idx;
+	u8			atu_mem_idx;
+	u8			atu_io_idx;
I don't like those single values. Can we please make this an array
indexed by a proper enum? Like this:

enum ATU_TYPE {
	ATU_TYPE_CFG0 = 0,
	ATU_TYPE_CFG1 = 1,
	ATU_TYPE_MEM  = 2,
	ATU_TYPE_IO   = 3,
	ATU_TYPE_MAX
}

u8	atu_idx[ATU_TYPE_MAX];
[Minghuan] Great. it's better to use array.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux