On Monday 10 November 2014 12:26:08 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 14 +++-------- > drivers/of/of_pci.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/of_pci.h | 7 +++--- > 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > index ce5836c..5e21c1c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > @@ -49,20 +49,14 @@ int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC > -static bool dt_domain_found = false; > > void pci_bus_assign_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus, struct device *parent) > { > - int domain = of_get_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node); > + int domain = of_assign_pci_domain_nr(parent->of_node); > > - if (domain >= 0) { > - dt_domain_found = true; > - } else if (dt_domain_found == true) { > - dev_err(parent, "Node %s is missing \"linux,pci-domain\" property in DT\n", > - parent->of_node->full_name); > - return; > - } else { > - domain = pci_get_new_domain_nr(); > + if (domain < 0) { > + dev_err(parent, "PCI domain assignment failed\n"); > + domain = -1; > } > > bus->domain_nr = domain; Is there a need to still keep this in architecture specific code? Why not move it to drivers/pci and let other firmware infrastructure hook in there directly. > { > @@ -45,10 +45,9 @@ of_pci_parse_bus_range(struct device_node *node, struct resource *res) > return -EINVAL; > } > > -static inline int > -of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node) > +static inline int of_assign_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node) > { > - return -1; > + return pci_get_new_domain_nr(); > } > #endif This gets a bit tricky otherwise once we add ACPI in the mix, with all combinations of OF and ACPI at compile time and at runtime. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html