On Wednesday 24 September 2014 18:10:48 Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:26:31PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote: > > On 24.09.14 18:14:11, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wednesday 24 September 2014 17:37:47 Robert Richter wrote: > > > > config PCI > > > > bool "PCI support" > > > > + default y > > > > help > > > > This feature enables support for PCIe bus system. If you say Y > > > > here, the kernel will include drivers and infrastructure code > > > > to support PCIe bus devices. > > > > > > > > +config PCI_MSI > > > > + def_bool PCI > > > > + > > > > config PCI_DOMAINS > > > > def_bool PCI > > > > > > There is already a PCI_MSI symbol in drivers/pci/Kconfig. Just select that > > > from the PCI symbol above rather than defining a second one. > > > > The intention is not to have a second definition, instead this should > > enable the default value just for arm64. Thus I put it to > > arch/arm64/Kconfig. Otherwise it would be enabled per default on all > > archs. I don't think other architectures actually see the PCI symbol that is defined in the arm64 Kconfig file, but I might be wrong. > > We could have used select in config ARM64, but I tried to avoid using > > select due to the dependency issue and instead implement this with > > default-y/depends-on. Doing so it can be manually disabled too. How about adding a new symbol like config ARM64_PCI def_bool PCI select PCI_MSI > It may be better to simply set PCI and PCI_MSI as defaults in defconfig > rather than "default y" and an additional config PCI_MSI entry. Selecting PCI_MSI unconditionally seems fine to me. We won't have any ARM64 systems that only do classic PCI, and MSI is mandatory for PCIe. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
