Re: [Patch v4 14/16] x86, irq: Introduce helper to check whether an IOAPIC has been registered

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2014/9/9 20:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> +	ret  = mp_ioapic_registered(gsi_base);
> >> +	up_write(&acpi_ioapic_rwsem);
> >> +
> >> +	return ret;
> >> +}
> > 
> > So I assume that this is for a particular caller in the apci ioapic
> > hotplug code and that call site has its own serialization. Otherwise
> > the return value is not protected at all.
> > 
> > Please add a Docbook comment to that function, and document the
> > locking rules as thats pretty non obvious.
> How about this comments about locking rules?
> /*
>  * Locks related to IOAPIC hotplug
>  * Hotplug side:
>  *      ->lock_device_hotplug() //device_hotplug_lock
>  *              ->acpi_ioapic_rwsem
>  *                      ->ioapic_lock
>  * Interrupt mapping side:
>  *      ->acpi_ioapic_rwsem
>  *              ->ioapic_mutex
>  *                      ->ioapic_lock
>  */

That looks asymetric. Why is the hotplug side not taking ioapic_mutex?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux