On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014 20:20:44 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Hum, I think I would actually prefer something like:
>>
>> if (DT_FLAGS_TO_TYPE(flags) == DT_TYPE_IO)
>> rtype = IORESOURCE_IO;
>> else if (DT_FLAGS_TO_TYPE(flags) == DT_TYPE_MEM32)
>> rtype = IORESOURCE_MEM;
>> + else
>> + continue;
>>
>> So that we're explicit with the fact that we only care about I/O and
>> MEM32 resource types.
>
> Agreed, that looks better than my patch as well.
I like it better, too, but we still need the "range += rangesz" part,
so I don't think it will work. I suppose that could be moved to the
update expression of the "for" loop. Or, since we don't use "i" in
the loop at all, maybe we could do something like this:
for (; range < rend; range += rangesz)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
