On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:14:29AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>Read_msi_msg() only be called in rtas_setup_msi_irqs(),
read_msi_msg()
This code looks good to me, while I can't apply on top of 3.17-rc1.
If you rebase it, it would be more convenient for maintainer to merge.
>use __read_msi_msg() instead of read_msi_msg for
>simplification. And rename __read_msi_msg() to
>read_msi_msg().
>
>Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>CC: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 9 +--------
> include/linux/msi.h | 3 +--
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
>index 0c882e8..591650b 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c
>@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ again:
> irq_set_msi_desc(virq, entry);
>
> /* Read config space back so we can restore after reset */
>- read_msi_msg(virq, &msg);
>+ read_msi_msg(entry, &msg);
> entry->msg = msg;
> }
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
>index 905956f..4656099 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
>@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int xen_hvm_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
> return 1;
>
> list_for_each_entry(msidesc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
>- __read_msi_msg(msidesc, &msg);
>+ read_msi_msg(msidesc, &msg);
> pirq = MSI_ADDR_EXT_DEST_ID(msg.address_hi) |
> ((msg.address_lo >> MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_SHIFT) & 0xff);
> if (msg.data != XEN_PIRQ_MSI_DATA ||
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>index 988224f..cbb41d6 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
> }
>
>-void __read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg)
>+void read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg)
> {
> BUG_ON(entry->dev->current_state != PCI_D0);
>
>@@ -289,13 +289,6 @@ void __read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg)
> }
> }
>
>-void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
>-{
>- struct msi_desc *entry = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
>-
>- __read_msi_msg(entry, msg);
>-}
>-
> void get_cached_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg)
> {
> /* Assert that the cache is valid, assuming that
>diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
>index e3adf93..4d7c0f5 100644
>--- a/include/linux/msi.h
>+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
>@@ -15,10 +15,9 @@ struct irq_data;
> struct msi_desc;
> void mask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *data);
> void unmask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *data);
>-void __read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
>+void read_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void get_cached_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void __write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
>-void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
>
> struct msi_desc {
>--
>1.7.1
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
