Hi Alexander, I believe I acked the series already, if not, I am acking all the bfa patches in this series. Thanks, Anil -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Gordeev [mailto:agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 12 August 2014 16:20 To: Anil Gurumurthy Cc: linux-kernel; Anil Gurumurthy; Vijaya Mohan Guvva; linux-scsi; linux-pci; Sudarsana Kalluru Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 04/23] bfa: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead of pci_enable_msix() On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:02:56AM +0000, Anil Gurumurthy wrote: > Acked-by: Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@xxxxxxxxxx> Many thanks, Anil! If your Ack apply to this patch only or to all three 'bfa' patches in this series? Thanks! > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Gordeev [mailto:agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 11 August 2014 13:09 > To: linux-kernel > Cc: Anil Gurumurthy; Vijaya Mohan Guvva; linux-scsi; linux-pci; Anil > Gurumurthy; Sudarsana Kalluru > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 04/23] bfa: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() > instead of pci_enable_msix() > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > As result of deprecation of MSI-X/MSI enablement functions > > pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() all drivers using these > > two interfaces need to be updated to use the new > > pci_enable_msi_range() or pci_enable_msi_exact() and > > pci_enable_msix_range() or pci_enable_msix_exact() interfaces. > > Anil, Sudarsana, > > Could you please review bfa patches in this series? > > Thanks! > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Anil Gurumurthy <agurumur@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Vijaya Mohan Guvva <vmohan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Acked-by: Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c | 20 ++++++-------------- > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c index > > c18279f..e90a374 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad.c > > @@ -1234,29 +1234,21 @@ bfad_setup_intr(struct bfad_s *bfad) > > if ((bfa_asic_id_ctc(pdev->device) && !msix_disable_ct) || > > (bfa_asic_id_cb(pdev->device) && !msix_disable_cb)) { > > > > - error = pci_enable_msix(bfad->pcidev, msix_entries, bfad->nvec); > > + error = pci_enable_msix_exact(bfad->pcidev, > > + msix_entries, bfad->nvec); > > /* In CT1 & CT2, try to allocate just one vector */ > > - if (error > 0 && bfa_asic_id_ctc(pdev->device)) { > > + if (error == -ENOSPC && bfa_asic_id_ctc(pdev->device)) { > > printk(KERN_WARNING "bfa %s: trying one msix " > > "vector failed to allocate %d[%d]\n", > > bfad->pci_name, bfad->nvec, error); > > bfad->nvec = 1; > > - error = pci_enable_msix(bfad->pcidev, > > - msix_entries, bfad->nvec); > > + error = pci_enable_msix_exact(bfad->pcidev, > > + msix_entries, 1); > > } > > > > - /* > > - * Only error number of vector is available. > > - * We don't have a mechanism to map multiple > > - * interrupts into one vector, so even if we > > - * can try to request less vectors, we don't > > - * know how to associate interrupt events to > > - * vectors. Linux doesn't duplicate vectors > > - * in the MSIX table for this case. > > - */ > > if (error) { > > printk(KERN_WARNING "bfad%d: " > > - "pci_enable_msix failed (%d), " > > + "pci_enable_msix_exact failed (%d), " > > "use line based.\n", > > bfad->inst_no, error); > > goto line_based; > > -- > > 1.7.7.6 > > -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
