On Friday 18 July 2014 14:31:39 Rob Herring wrote:
> > +
> > + Example:
> > + pcie_msi_intc: msi-interrupt-controller {
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > + };
> > +
> > +pcie_intc: Interrupt controller device node for Legacy irq chip
> > + interrupt-cells: should be set to 1
> > + interrupt-parent: Parent interrupt controller phandle
> > + interrupts: GIC interrupt lines connected to PCI Legacy interrupt lines
> > +
> > + Example:
> > + pcie_intc: legacy-interrupt-controller {
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > + };
>
> This seems wrong. Legacy interrupts should be described with
> interrupt-map and then PCI child devices have a standard interrupt
> specifier.
>
> I'm not sure about MSIs, but I would think they would have a standard
> format too.
>
IIRC, it's actually the correct way to do this here: the problem is that
the PCI IRQs are not directly connected to the GIC, but instead there is
a nested irqchip that has each PCI IRQ routed to it and that requires
an extra EOI for each interrupt.
The interrupt-map in the PCI host points to this special irqchip rather
than to the GIC.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
