On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> I wonder if it would help to make a weak pci_domain_nr() function that >> returns "bridge->domain_nr". Then each arch could individually drop its >> pci_domain_nr() definition as it was converted, e.g., something like this: >> >> - Convert every arch pci_domain_nr() from a #define to a non-inline >> function >> - Add bridge.domain_nr, initialized from pci_domain_nr() >> - Add a weak generic pci_domain_nr() that returns bridge.domain_nr >> - Add a way to create a host bridge in a specified domain, so we can >> initialize bridge.domain_nr without using pci_domain_nr() >> - Convert each arch to use the new creation mechanism and drop its >> pci_domain_nr() implementation > > I will try to propose a patch implementing this. I think this is more of an extra credit, cleanup sort of thing. I don't think it advances your primary goal of (I think) getting arm64 PCI support in. So my advice is to not worry about unifying domain handling until later. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
