On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 09:28:07AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > pci_wait_for_pending() uses word access, so we shouldn't be passing > an offset that is only byte aligned. Use the control register offset > instead, shifting the mask to match. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Applied with Gavin's ack to for-linus for v3.16, thanks! > --- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index 759475e..81012ec 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -3109,8 +3109,13 @@ static int pci_af_flr(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe) > if (probe) > return 0; > > - /* Wait for Transaction Pending bit clean */ > - if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_STATUS, PCI_AF_STATUS_TP)) > + /* > + * Wait for Transaction Pending bit to clear. A word-aligned test > + * is used, so we use the conrol offset rather than status and shift > + * the test bit to match. > + */ > + if (pci_wait_for_pending(dev, pos + PCI_AF_CTRL, > + PCI_AF_STATUS_TP << 8)) > goto clear; > > dev_err(&dev->dev, "transaction is not cleared; " > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
