On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Noever wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Garrett
> <matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yeah, it seems I don't need the suspend quirk - the NHI is still there
> > without it. I still think we should make the quirk general rather than
> > tying it to the machines, the worst case is that it'll just do nothing.
> Ok, agreed. The "wait" quirk has to run on all machines and the other
> one will fail if the ACPI methods are not there. Should I resend the
> series or just the patch or should I (or do you want to) make a
> separate patch?
Probably best to ask Greg - I'm fine with this stuff going through his
tree (note to Greg: the Apple ACPI patches I just sent need to be merged
before this stuff will work properly)
--
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���"�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
