On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 6:49 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>
> add_pcie_port is called from probe which is annotated with __init.
> add_pcie_port calls dw_pcie_host_init which is also annotated with
> __init. Thus it makes sense to annotate add_pcie_port with __init
> to avoid the following section mismatch warning:
>
> WARNING: drivers/pci/built-in.o(.text.unlikely+0xf8): Section mismatch in reference from the function
> add_pcie_port() to the function .init.text:dw_pcie_host_init()
> The function add_pcie_port() references
> the function __init dw_pcie_host_init().
> This is often because add_pcie_port lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of dw_pcie_host_init is wrong.
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> index 3de6bfbbe8e9..3c1ff89829ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> @@ -511,7 +511,8 @@ static struct pcie_host_ops exynos_pcie_host_ops = {
> .host_init = exynos_pcie_host_init,
> };
>
> -static int add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp, struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int __init add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
> + struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret;
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
