On Tuesday 20 May 2014 09:52:33 Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
> >> In sriov_enable() (drivers/pci/iov.c)
> >>
> >> 296 for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> >> 297 bars |= (1 << (i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES));
> >> 298 res = dev->resource + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i;
> >> 299 if (res->parent)
> >> 300 nres++;
> >> 301 }
> >> 302 if (nres != iov->nres) {
> >> 303 dev_err(&dev->dev, "not enough MMIO resources for
> >> SR-IOV\n");
> >> 304 return -ENOMEM;
> >> 305 }
> >>
> >> Here its checking if physical function's IOV resource has a parent or not.
> >> Which is pci-pci bridge in this case. Otherwise it doesn't consider
> >> that resource.
> >>
> >> Added below api to your patch.
> >> This will try to claim a resource while creating a PCI device which
> >> inturn sets 'res->parent'.
> >
> > This looks like the wrong approach. The PCI host controller should
> > really have been registered with the root 'iomem_resource' during
> > the probe of the host controller.
> >
> I didn't get this, if a SR-IOV device is connected to a PCI-PCI bridge
> and inturn bridge connected to root port. Then the parent bus is not root,
> but the bridge. The issue is either hierarchy should not be checked for
> SR-IOV resources or someone should set the hierarchy (i.e parent resources).
Ah, I misunderstood the problem, I thought the PCI core was complaining
about lack of space in the resources, not about a lack of BARs.
It seems there is code like yours in a couple of architectures, but they
only claim the resources of bridges, not the actual devices as you
seem to be doing. Can you check if the x86 version of
pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() does the trick for you? Maybe we can
turn that into a generic helper.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
