On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 05:46:36PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> index 317da88..31ec14a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_pci.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
>> #include <asm/mach/map.h>
>> @@ -337,6 +338,15 @@ void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>> u16 cmd;
>>
>> + /* Ignore fully discovered devices */
>> + if (dev->is_added)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + set_dev_node(&dev->dev, pcibus_to_node(dev->bus));
>
> We already do this in pci_device_add(); why do we need it here, too?
Because it was in the arm64 code. I'm not really sure.
>> + /* Read default IRQs and fixup if necessary */
>> + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
>
> Could this be done in pcibios_enable_device() or some other per-device
> interface()? I'd like to get rid of pcibios_fixup_bus() eventually.
Probably. This should return NO_IRQ in the !OF case. We'd need to make
sure that works.
I had a loop at pcibios_fixup_bus across architectures and could make
no sense of why things were done in here. It all seemed a bit random
and left me with questions like shouldn't something always be needed.
Probably a lot of pieces are redundant now that didn't use to be. It
needs someone that knows more about PCI than me to look at.
>> pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &cmd);
>> cmd |= features;
>> pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
>> @@ -681,3 +691,56 @@ void __init pci_map_io_early(unsigned long pfn)
>> pci_io_desc.pfn = pfn;
>> iotable_init(&pci_io_desc, 1);
>> }
>> +
>> +struct ioresource {
>> + struct list_head list;
>> + phys_addr_t start;
>> + resource_size_t size;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static LIST_HEAD(io_list);
>> +
>> +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size)
>> +{
>> + struct ioresource *res;
>> + resource_size_t allocated_size = 0;
>> +
>> + /* find if the range has not been already allocated */
>> + list_for_each_entry(res, &io_list, list) {
>> + if (address >= res->start &&
>> + address + size <= res->start + size)
>> + return 0;
>> + allocated_size += res->size;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* range not already registered, check for space */
>> + if (allocated_size + size > IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
>> + return -E2BIG;
>> +
>> + /* add the range in the list */
>> + res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!res)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + res->start = address;
>> + res->size = size;
>> +
>> + list_add_tail(&res->list, &io_list);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_register_io_range);
>> +
>> +unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)
>> +{
>> + struct ioresource *res;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(res, &io_list, list) {
>> + if (address >= res->start &&
>> + address < res->start + res->size) {
>> + return res->start - address;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return (unsigned long)-1;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_address_to_pio);
>
> ISTR some discussion about this, so maybe this has already been addressed,
> but it doesn't seem right to export generically-named symbols like these
> from the ARM arch code. And they don't look very ARM-specific.
Right, I expect these to go away with Liviu's the next version.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
