On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 09:46 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > *My* strategy is to get rid of pci_domain_nr(). I don't see why we need > > to have arch specific way of providing the number, specially after looking > > at the existing implementations that return a value from a variable that > > is never touched or incremented. My guess is that pci_domain_nr() was > > created to work around the fact that there was no domain_nr maintainance in > > the generic code. > > Well, there was no generic host bridge structure. There is one now, it should > go there. Exactly! Hence my patch. After it gets accepted I will go through architectures and remove their version of pci_domain_nr(). Best regards, Liviu > > Cheers, > Ben. > > > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html