Hi Lucas,
On 21/03/2014 14:27, Lucas wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] PCI: host: rcar: Add MSI support
>
> Am Freitag, den 21.03.2014, 14:15 +0000 schrieb
> Phil.Edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > On 21/03/2014 11:18, Lucas wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] PCI: host: rcar: Add MSI support
> > >
> > > Am Freitag, den 21.03.2014, 10:32 +0000 schrieb Phil Edworthy:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 232
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.h | 5 +
> > > > 2 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> > > > index 16670e5..cbbcd77 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> > > [...]
> > > > +
> > > > +static irqreturn_t rcar_pcie_msi_irq(int irq, void *data)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct rcar_pcie *pcie = data;
> > > > + struct rcar_msi *msi = &pcie->msi;
> > > > + unsigned long reg;
> > > > +
> > > > + reg = pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIFR);
> > > > +
> > > > + while (reg) {
> > > > + unsigned int index = find_first_bit(®, 32);
> > > > + unsigned int irq;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* clear the interrupt */
> > > > + pci_write_reg(pcie, 1 << index, PCIEMSIFR);
> > > > +
> > > > + irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->domain, index);
> > > > + if (irq) {
> > > > + if (test_bit(index, msi->used))
> > > > + generic_handle_irq(irq);
> > > > + else
> > > > + dev_info(pcie->dev, "unhandled MSI\n");
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * that's weird who triggered this?
> > > > + * just clear it
> > > > + */
> > > > + dev_info(pcie->dev, "unexpected MSI\n");
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* see if there's any more pending in this vector */
> > > > + reg = pci_read_reg(pcie, PCIEMSIFR);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > From your DT binding it seems you have only one interrupt from the
PCIe
> > > core, shared between the MSI irqs and the PCI legacy interrupts.
> > > This means this handler may get called without an MSI irq pending,
so
> > > this function really should have a path where it's returning
IRQ_NONE.
> > Ah, yes you are right... though actually there are two interrupts, one
has
> > some MSI and INTx, the other has the rest of the MSIs.
> >
> This isn't reflected in the DT binding. If you already know that there
> may be more than a single interrupt for MSI, please push this into the
> binding by using named interrupts. Even if your driver doesn't support
> it yet, additional functionality can always be added later, but the DT
> should be a stable ABI describing your hardware.
>
> So if you already know your hardware has more than one interrupt, please
> put it in the binding, to avoid churn later on.
At the moment we support both interrupts but the code implicitly gets the
'next' interrupt for MSI. I'll change that so that all the interrupts are
specified in the binding.
> Regards,
> Lucas
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/
|
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-5076
|
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555
|
>
Thanks
Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
