On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> >> > >> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially > >> >> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well. > >> >> > >> >> Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Cc: Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@xxxxxx> > >> >> Cc: pci <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thomas, I assume you'll merge this along with the rest of your series. > >> I don't have any pending changes in this area. > > > > I can do, but it does not depend on anything else, so you can pick it > > up as well. Either way is fine. > > I never know what to do with these. I suggested that you pick it up > so the whole series would be together, because I assumed it would make > more sense in the git history to have all these similar changes > grouped together. But maybe that really doesn't matter. > > What's the recommended practice? Dunno. There is no rule. I'll merge it up with the rest of the lot. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
