Hi Alexander,
The change is fine - but not really necessary. The pci_disable_msix()
call explicitly checks for enablement so it's safe.
It really is a superfluous change - but if James wants to take it:
Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxx>
-- james s
On 2/4/2014 6:16 AM, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 68c94cc..a9df97a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -8078,7 +8078,7 @@ lpfc_sli_enable_msix(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
if (rc) {
lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_INIT,
"0420 PCI enable MSI-X failed (%d)\n", rc);
- goto msi_fail_out;
+ goto vec_fail_out;
}
for (i = 0; i < LPFC_MSIX_VECTORS; i++)
lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_INIT,
@@ -8156,6 +8156,8 @@ irq_fail_out:
msi_fail_out:
/* Unconfigure MSI-X capability structure */
pci_disable_msix(phba->pcidev);
+
+vec_fail_out:
return rc;
}
@@ -8644,7 +8646,7 @@ enable_msix_vectors:
} else if (rc) {
lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_INIT,
"0484 PCI enable MSI-X failed (%d)\n", rc);
- goto msi_fail_out;
+ goto vec_fail_out;
}
/* Log MSI-X vector assignment */
@@ -8696,9 +8698,10 @@ cfg_fail_out:
&phba->sli4_hba.fcp_eq_hdl[index]);
}
-msi_fail_out:
/* Unconfigure MSI-X capability structure */
pci_disable_msix(phba->pcidev);
+
+vec_fail_out:
return rc;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
