Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>>> Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your >>>> tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches >>>> altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi >>>> branch though. >>> >>> It's in pci/msi, but that's not in my -next branch yet, so I can >>> easily drop it. Do drivers/net/wireless patches normally follow a >>> different path than the other drivers/net patches? The wil6210 and >>> ath10k patches look just like the others in the 34-patch series (bnx2, >>> bnx2x, tg3, bna, cxgb3, etc.), so I thought it would make more sense >>> to include them there. >> >> ath10k patches normally go through my ath.git tree to Linville and then >> to David Miller. To avoid conflicts I would prefer to take ath10k >> patches to my tree whenever possible. > > OK, I won't do anything with ath10k (I haven't applied it anywhere). I have now taken the ath10k patches to my pending branch, will apply them soon. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
