On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:26:27PM +0000, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> Hello Liviu,
>
> I did not get the first email of this particular patch on any of
> subscribed mailing lists (don't know why), hence replying here.
Strange, it shows in the MARC and GMANE archive for linux-pci, probably
a hickup on your receiving side?
>
> +struct pci_host_bridge *
> +pci_host_bridge_of_init(struct device *parent, int busno, struct pci_ops *ops,
> + void *host_data, struct list_head *resources)
> +{
> + struct pci_bus *root_bus;
> + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> +
> + /* first parse the host bridge bus ranges */
> + if (pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges(parent->of_node, resources))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* then create the root bus */
> + root_bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent, busno, ops, host_data, resources);
> + if (!root_bus)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(root_bus->bridge);
> +
> + return bridge;
> +}
>
> You are keeping the domain_nr inside pci_host_bridge structure. In
> above API, domain_nr is required in 'pci_find_bus' function called
> from 'pci_create_root_bus'. Since the bridge is allocated after
> creating root bus, 'pci_find_bus' always gets domain_nr as 0. This
> will cause problem for scanning multiple domains.
Good catch. I was switching between creating a pci_controller in arch/arm64 and
adding the needed bits in pci_host_bridge. After internal review I've decided to
add the domain_nr to pci_host_bridge, but forgot to update the code everywhere.
Thanks for reviewing this, will fix in v2.
Do you find porting to the new API straight forward?
Best regards,
Liviu
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Monday 03 February 2014 18:33:48 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >> +/**
> >> + * pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT
> >> + * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property
> >> + * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing
> >> + *
> >> + * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device
> >> + * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected
> >> + * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document.
> >> + *
> >> + * Each architecture will then apply their filtering based on the limitations
> >> + * of each platform. One general restriction seems to be the number of IO space
> >> + * ranges, the PCI framework makes intensive use of struct resource management,
> >> + * and for IORESOURCE_IO types they can only be requested if they are contained
> >> + * within the global ioport_resource, so that should be limited to one IO space
> >> + * range.
> >
> > Actually we have quite a different set of restrictions around I/O space on ARM32
> > at the moment: Each host bridge can have its own 64KB range in an arbitrary
> > location on MMIO space, and the total must not exceed 2MB of I/O space.
> >
> >> + */
> >> +static int pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges(struct device_node *dev,
> >> + struct list_head *resources)
> >> +{
> >> + struct resource *res;
> >> + struct of_pci_range range;
> >> + struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> >> + int err;
> >> +
> >> + pr_info("PCI host bridge %s ranges:\n", dev->full_name);
> >> +
> >> + /* Check for ranges property */
> >> + err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev);
> >> + if (err)
> >> + return err;
> >> +
> >> + pr_debug("Parsing ranges property...\n");
> >> + for_each_of_pci_range(&parser, &range) {
> >> + /* Read next ranges element */
> >> + pr_debug("pci_space: 0x%08x pci_addr:0x%016llx ",
> >> + range.pci_space, range.pci_addr);
> >> + pr_debug("cpu_addr:0x%016llx size:0x%016llx\n",
> >> + range.cpu_addr, range.size);
> >> +
> >> + /* If we failed translation or got a zero-sized region
> >> + * (some FW try to feed us with non sensical zero sized regions
> >> + * such as power3 which look like some kind of attempt
> >> + * at exposing the VGA memory hole) then skip this range
> >> + */
> >> + if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || range.size == 0)
> >> + continue;
> >> +
> >> + res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!res) {
> >> + err = -ENOMEM;
> >> + goto bridge_ranges_nomem;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev, res);
> >> +
> >> + pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res,
> >> + range.cpu_addr - range.pci_addr);
> >> + }
> >
> > I believe of_pci_range_to_resource() will return the MMIO aperture for the
> > I/O space window here, which is not what you are supposed to pass into
> > pci_add_resource_offset.
> >
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_host_bridge_of_init);
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> >> index 6e34498..16febae 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> >> @@ -1787,6 +1787,17 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> >> list_for_each_entry_safe(window, n, resources, list) {
> >> list_move_tail(&window->list, &bridge->windows);
> >> res = window->res;
> >> + /*
> >> + * IO resources are stored in the kernel with a CPU start
> >> + * address of zero. Adjust the data accordingly and remember
> >> + * the offset
> >> + */
> >> + if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> >> + bridge->io_offset = res->start;
> >> + res->end -= res->start;
> >> + window->offset -= res->start;
> >> + res->start = 0;
> >> + }
> >> offset = window->offset;
> >> if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS)
> >
> > Won't this break all existing host bridges?
> >
> > Arnd
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
