On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/02/14 09:00, Magnus Damm wrote: >> >> Hi Ben, > > > [snip] > >> I think we should try to pick out the stuff that is ready to be merged >> first. I think these patches may require a bit of time before people >> start looking at them. I don't mind resending in the future. >> >> To be honest, I have not been paying too much attention to other >> patches including yours - been focused trying to get the memory >> management part right.. So I'd like to focus on correctness over DT >> for now if possible. Of course we it all. >> >> Would it be possible for you to provide a list of pci-rcar-gen2.c >> patches that you posted? Or perhaps you can resend your series and >> include acks that you received? > > > I don't think I have any acks, only review comments. I think the code > itself is pretty much ready to be merged and has been tested here with > the Lager board. Ok, thanks. I'd like to go through them myself if possible. I was looking for a cover letter or something that listed the patches but I can't seem to find it. Can you please provide a list? > The big issue for us is that we /must/ boot with fdt, which means the > less fdt support that is in the kernel then the more patches we end up > carrying out of tree. This is why we have been pushing patches out to > try and get the support in. Can you please define "boot with fdt"? As you probably know, both board-lager.c and board-lager-reference.c boot with DT. I suppose you mean that you want DT to describe the entire system, with no C code for the board? Please note that some devices like timers still don't use DT, so if you can live without those then... =) Thanks, / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
