> -----Original Message----- > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 8:13 PM > To: Bjorn Helgaas > Cc: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Zang Roy-R61911; Wood Scott-B07421; Kumar Gala; Linux > PM list; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev > Subject: Re: [RFC] linux/pci: move pci_platform_pm_ops to linux/pci.h > > On Friday, December 20, 2013 09:42:59 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Dongsheng Wang > > <dongsheng.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > make Freescale platform use pci_platform_pm_ops struct. > > > > This changelog doesn't say anything about what the patch does. > > > > I infer that you want to use pci_platform_pm_ops from some Freescale > > code. This patch should be posted along with the patches that add > > that Freescale code, so we can see how you intend to use it. > > > > The existing use is in drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c, so it's possible that > > your new use should be added in the same way, in drivers/pci, so we > > don't have to make pci_platform_pm_ops part of the public PCI > > interface in include/linux/pci.h. > > > > That said, if Raphael thinks this makes sense, it's OK with me. > > Well, I'd like to know why exactly the change is needed in the first place. > Thanks for review, I think the idea is not suitable for freescale platform implementation of the right now. I will drop this RFC patch. -Dongsheng > Thanks! > > -- > I speak only for myself. > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. > ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���"�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
