On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 19:30 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:00:42 -0700 > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:15:57 -0700 > >> > >>> However, I do raise my eyebrows a bit at drivers that poke around in > >>> the PCIe capability. I would prefer to have PCI core interfaces that > >>> handle that instead. But I haven't seen Jeff's changes yet. > >> > >> The changes just read the link status to interpret the speed at which > >> the PCI-E link is running at. > > > > Several drivers want to do that. It'd be nice if somebody abstracted > > that out somehow. Jacob added pcie_get_minimum_link() which is > > similar. But maybe Jeff needs something more in this case. > > > > In any case, it's not a blocker for this patch. > > Ok. > > Jeff, please merge this via the Intel submission process and don't forget > to add Bjorn's ACK. > > Thanks. Ok, will do. What do you want to do with the current series of patches (mainly the ixgbe LER patches) on my tree? I know that there is a thread going on between Joe Perches and Mark, but it sounded like Mark is working on a follow-on patch to address Joe's concerns. Guess I want to know if I leave my tree alone for you to pull or toss the current pull request series and get the i40e series applied. Cheers, Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
