Em Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:40:20 +0100 Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:26:55PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote: > > According to the comment, it should be done before submitting upstream. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 21 ++------------------- > > include/linux/pci_ids.h | 11 +++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c > > index e04462b..4cdd948 100644 > > --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c > > +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c > > @@ -57,26 +57,9 @@ static int probed; > > */ > > > > /* > > - * FIXME: For now, let's order by device function, as it makes > > - * easier for driver's development process. This table should be > > - * moved to pci_id.h when submitted upstream > > Why, is anything else besides sb_edac.c using those? > I think that this patch makes sense, as the other Sandy Bridge registers are at pci_ids.h. So, it is a matter of consistency. Also, I won't doubt that other drivers could need to access those, as there are other things there on a few of those PCI IDs. Yet, on patch 12/12, you're adding the Ivy Bridge specific PCI IDs inside the driver. So, IMHO, you should either move all to pci_ids.h or to keep them inside the driver. My personal taste would be to move them all to pci_ids.h. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
