On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:28:52PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> [+cc Seungwon] >> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe >> <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Otherwise hotplugging the PEX doesn't work at all since the driver >> > detects the link state at probe time. Simply replacing the two tests >> > of haslink with a register read is enough to fix it. >> > >> > Tested on kirkwood with repeated plug/unplug of the link partner. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Last I heard (Sep 26), you had some mvebu changes in your tree >> already, Jason, so I was assuming you'd handle pci-mvebu.c changes, at >> least for the v3.13 merge window. But you marked this "resend"; does >> that mean you're waiting for me to do something with it? > > Are you thinking of Jason C.? He is handling much of the mvebu stuff. Oops, sorry, yep, indeed I meant Jason C. Sorry about confusing you guys :) > Hopefully Jason C. can clarify which route these patches should take > to hit the 3.13 merge window. > > This was reposted at the request of Thomas, IIRC. > >> PCI: mvebu - Support a bridge with no IO port window > > This one is broken, I have yet to fix it still. > >> PCI: mvebu: add I/O access wrappers > > This isn't one of mine .. That's Seungwon's. I just wanted to collect all the mvebu patches from the PCI patchwork. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
