Re: [PATCH 00/14] _OSC simplification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, September 07, 2013 07:59:39 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Friday, September 06, 2013 11:13:24 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> This is a long series of mostly minor changes with the goal of
> >> simplifying the _OSC-related code and making the negotiation between
> >> Linux and the platform more understandable.
> >>
> >> My intent is that this doesn't change any behavior except for the text
> >> in dmesg.
> >>
> >> However, this restructuring does raise some questions in my mind, such
> >> as the fact that we do not call pcie_no_aspm() to disable ASPM in two
> >> cases where it seems like we might want to:
> >>
> >>   1) When pcie_ports_disabled, e.g., when booting with
> >>      "pcie_ports=compat".
> >>
> >>   2) When Linux doesn't support all the required services, e.g., if
> >>      compiled with ASPM support but not MSI support.
> >
> > We tried that (i.e. 2)), but then it caused energy usage to increase on some
> > systems with power-hungry graphics adapters and Phoronix made some fuss about
> > that. :-)
> 
> The _OSC section of the spec is pretty obtuse, but my reading of Table
> 4-6 (PCI Firmware r3.0) is that the OS is prohibited from writing to
> the PCIe Capability (for ASPM, VC, AER, or other control) unless it
> has been granted "PCI Express Capability Structure control".  That's
> why I'm dubious about the fact that we use ASPM in those two cases
> where we don't even *ask* for that control.
> 
> For the Phoronix case, I assume they made the argument that Windows
> does use ASPM without having PCIe Capability control?

No, this was regarded as a kernel regression that needed to be addressed.

> Do you have any pointers to that discussion?

This is the Phoronix link:

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_aspm_solution&num=1

and I think you can get to some more info from there.

> I don't propose changing this now, but it does raise my eyebrows.
> Maybe some sort of dmesg note would be appropriate.
> 
> Thanks for looking at all this stuff; I know from experience that it's
> pretty hard to wade through :)

No problem. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux