On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:57:20AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Jiang]
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I tried adding support for the newly added 'pcie_get_minimum_link' into
> >> >> the
> >> >> > bnx2x driver, but found out the some of my devices started showing
> >> width
> >> >> x0.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > By adding debug prints, I've found out there were devices up the chain
> >> that
> >> >> > Showed 0 when their PCI_EXP_LNKSTA was read by said function.
> >> >> > However, when I tried looking via lspci the output claimed the width was
> >> >> x4.
> >> Looking at its implementation, one obvious difference is that
> >> pcie_get_minimum_link() traverses up the hierarchy and keeps track of
> >> the minimum values it finds. lspci, on the other hand, just reads
> >> PCI_EXP_LNKSTA from a single device and decodes it.
> >>
> >> You said lspci reports x4 for every device from the Root Port all the
> >> way down to your NIC, so I would think the minimum from
> >> pcie_get_minimum_link() would be x4. But apparently it's not. Maybe
> >> there's a bug in it. Can you post the complete "lspci -vv" output
> >> along with your debug patch and output?
> >>
> >> Bjorn
> >
> > Here's the patch:
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index c71e78c..72cb87b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -3601,13 +3601,19 @@ int pcie_get_minimum_link(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bus_speed *speed,
> > enum pcie_link_width next_width;
> >
> > ret = pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnksta);
> > - if (ret)
> > + if (ret) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to Read LNKSTA\n");
> > return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > next_speed = pcie_link_speed[lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS];
> > next_width = (lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW) >>
> > PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW_SHIFT;
> >
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "LnkSta %04x [%04x:%02x.%02x]\n",
> > + lnksta, dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn),
> > + PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn));
>
> I think pcie_cap_has_lnkctl() is incorrect: it currently thinks only
> Root Ports, Endpoints, and Legacy Endpoints have link registers. But
> I think switch ports (Upstream Ports and Downstream Ports) also have
> link registers (PCIe spec r3.0, sec 7.8). Jiang?
Yuval, can you try the patch below?
PCI: Allow access to link-related registers for switch and bridge ports
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Every PCIe device has a link, except Root Complex Integrated Endpoints
and Root Complex Event Collectors. Previously we didn't give access
to PCIe capability link-related registers for Upstream Ports, Downstream
Ports, and bridges, so attempts to read PCI_EXP_LNKCTL returned zero.
See PCIe spec r3.0, sec 7.8 and 1.3.2.3.
Reported-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/access.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index 1cc2366..46dd5ad 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -485,9 +485,8 @@ static inline bool pcie_cap_has_lnkctl(const struct pci_dev *dev)
int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
return pcie_cap_version(dev) > 1 ||
- type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
- type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT ||
- type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_LEG_END;
+ !(type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END ||
+ type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC);
}
static inline bool pcie_cap_has_sltctl(const struct pci_dev *dev)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
