On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxx> > > Correct minor wording issue in MPS Peer-to-peer comment. > > Noticed by Don Dutile > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxx> Applied to pci/yijing-mps-v8 > --- > drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c > index 0e8cff2..21ca9a1 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c > @@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ void pcie_bus_configure_settings(struct pci_bus *bus) > return; > > /* FIXME - Peer to peer DMA is possible, though the endpoint would need > - * to be aware to the MPS of the destination. To work around this, > + * to be aware of the MPS of the destination. To work around this, > * simply force the MPS of the entire system to the smallest possible. > */ > if (pcie_bus_config == PCIE_BUS_PEER2PEER) > -- > 1.7.1 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html