On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:15:04PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > - Two, if ghes_edac is enabled, it prevents other edac drivers
> > from being loaded. It looks like the assumption here is that if
> > ghes/firmware first is enabled, then *all* memory errors are
> > reported through ghes which is not true. We could have (a subset
> > of) corrected errors reported through ghes, some through CMCI
> > and uncorrected errors through MCE. So, if I'm not mistaken, if
> > ghes_edac is enabled, we will only receive ghes error events through
> > mc_event and not the others. Mauro, is this accurate?
>
> Yes, that's the current assumption. It prevents to have both BIOS and a
> direct-hardware-access-EDAC-driver to race, as this is known to have
> serious issues.
Ok, this is getting confusing so let's shed some more light.
* First of all, Naveen is asking whether other *edac* drivers can
be loaded. And no, they cannot once the ghes thing is loaded which
potentially is a problem.
For example, if the chipset-specific driver has additional functionality
from ghes_edac, then that functionality is gone when ghes_edac loads
first. This might be a problem in some cases, we probably need to think
about this more in depth.
* Then, there's the trace_mce_record() TP which comes straight
from mce.c This one is always enabled unless the mce_disable_bank
functionality kicks in which you, Naveen, added :-).
* The CMCI stuff should be synchronized with the MCE TP so that should
be ok.
I think those are our current error reporting paths...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
