On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Huh. I wish we didn't have virtfn_remove() at all. I wish the
>>> normal device removal path, i.e., pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(),
>>> could deal with VFs directly. I don't know all the history there,
>>> so maybe there's some reason that's not feasible.
>>
>> I had one draft version, but looks more confusing.
>
> please check attached that make pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device()
> could be used with VF.
If this solution could be used, we can revert
commit dfab88beda88d6c24111e5966b08ecf813c3a18a
Author: Jiang Liu <liuj97@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri May 31 12:21:31 2013 +0800
PCI: Hide remove and rescan sysfs interfaces for SR-IOV virtual functions
>
> It could replace
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2834638/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2834639/
>
> Please choose one of the solutions.
>
> but we still need
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2834640/
> as VFs that does not use ARI could be on other virtual bus.
> so they will not be removed directly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
