On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 08:42 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 08:31 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 00:04 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Again, this has been discussed at lengths in the previous iterations, > > > for which I already gave you all the links, as you requested in a > > > private e-mail. It'd be great if this discussion was read seriously, > > > because I really have the feeling we are restarting from zero on this > > > whole MSI thing... > > > > Well, two things here: > > > > - You don't need my ack since I am not the maintainer of the irqdomain > > code anymore, Grant is :-) > > Hrm, I'm being told Grant isn't anymore... I can step in and take it all > back but you might not like the result .... Oh but it looks like MAINTAINERS says I am :-) Ok so from that perspective, I don't like it at all. You can try to convince me otherwise but I don't think we need to introduce a dependency to something like msi into the core remapper. It's already to complex. Why don't you move the powerpc bitmap allocator over to a generic place ? I feel like it would be actually simpler but feel free to prove me wrong. Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html