On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:43:47AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Stephen Warren, > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:34:19 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > This patch set is intended for merging in 3.12, so the respective > > > maintainers of the different areas are invited to review/ack the > > > patches, see below for the details. This set of patches applies on top > > > of 3.11-rc1. > > > > Thomas, who is going to merge this series? > > I don't know. There are quite a few build dependencies in there: > > * PATCH 7 build depends on PATCH 1 and PATCH 5, and obviously depends > on PATCH 6. > > * PATCH 2 to 5 really are one thing, they depend on each other. > > * PATCH 10 build depends on PATCH 5 and PATCH 8. > > A quick diagram of the dependencies, best viewed with a fixed-size font > mailer. > > kernel/irq/irqdomain drivers/pci arch/arm/kernel > patch 1 patch 2, 3, 4 patch 8 > || || || > || \/ \/ > || drivers/of ==> drivers/pci/host > || patch 5 patch 10 > || || > \\__________________// > || > \/ > drivers/irqchip > patch 6, 7 Well, that got more complicated. :( No cookie for you. > Patches 9 and 11 are DT patches, so they are not mentioned in this > diagram. > > Normally tegra would require 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 8, so ideally, with > the respective maintainers ACKs, Jason Cooper could take them in a > specific topic stable branch that would not be rebased, on top of which > both the Marvell work and Tegra work could be done. After my recent discussions with tglx, here's my proposal: - rmk creates a dedicated topic branch with patch 8 - Bjorn creates a dedicated topic branch based on rmk's with 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 - tglx creates a dedicated topic branch based on Bjorn's with 1, 6, 7 - I take 9 and 11. For Tegra, tglx can tag patch 1 for merging. Tegra will 'adopt' patch 10, but that shouldn't hurt anything. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
