> > But Rusty added this (in 873392ca51), and he knows way more about this > > stuff than I do. > > Actually, I just stopped the code from playing cpumask games, which is > what it used to do. You're right the numa_node_id() check ptimization is not 100% safe on preempt kernels and should be probably removed. Also I agree it would probably make sense to move it up to the generic device layer (although I'm not sure that other bus types really care that much about NUMA locality) None of it seems to be a fatal problem though, so it boils down to "if someone cares enough to write a patch" -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
