On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Current acpiphp_check_bridge() implementation is pretty dumb:
> - it enables the slot if it's not enabled and the slot status is
> ACPI_STA_ALL;
> - it disables the slot if it's enabled and slot is not in ACPI_STA_ALL
> state.
>
> This behavior is not enough to handle Thunderbolt chaining case
> properly. We need to actually rescan for new devices even if a device
> has already in the slot.
>
> The new implementation disables and stops the slot if it's not in
> ACPI_STA_ALL state.
>
> For ACPI_STA_ALL state we first trim devices which don't respond and
> look for the ones after that. We do that even if slot already enabled
> (SLOT_ENABLED).
Just a couple of nitpicks below.
> list_for_each_entry(slot, &bridge->slots, node) {
> + struct pci_bus *bus = slot->bridge->pci_bus;
> + struct pci_dev *dev, *tmp;
> + int retval;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&slot->crit_sect);
Does it make sense to introduce a helper let's say
__acpiphp_check_slot() and put there all lines inside this mutex?
> + if (get_slot_status(slot) == ACPI_STA_ALL) {
> + /* remove stale devices if any */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp,
> + &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> + if (PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) != slot->device)
> + continue;
> + pci_trim_stale_devices(dev);
Perhaps
list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
if (PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot->device)
pci_trim_stale_devices(dev);
}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
