On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:53:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Enhance ARM architecture specific code to use new hotplug-safe PCI
> bus iterators to walk PCI buses.
>
> Change pcibios_report_status implementation so that it doesn't access
> pci_root_buses global list. The pci_root_buses list will be scheduled
> to be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 13 +------------
> arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> index b2ed73c..50ebbe8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static int debug_pci;
> * We can't use pci_find_device() here since we are
> * called from interrupt context.
> */
> -static void pcibios_bus_report_status(struct pci_bus *bus, u_int status_mask, int warn)
> +void pcibios_bus_report_status(struct pci_bus *bus, u_int status_mask, int warn)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
>
> @@ -55,17 +55,6 @@ static void pcibios_bus_report_status(struct pci_bus *bus, u_int status_mask, in
> pcibios_bus_report_status(dev->subordinate, status_mask, warn);
> }
>
> -void pcibios_report_status(u_int status_mask, int warn)
> -{
> - struct list_head *l;
> -
> - list_for_each(l, &pci_root_buses) {
> - struct pci_bus *bus = pci_bus_b(l);
> -
> - pcibios_bus_report_status(bus, status_mask, warn);
> - }
> -}
> -
> /*
> * We don't use this to fix the device, but initialisation of it.
> * It's not the correct use for this, but it works.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c b/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c
> index a7cd2cf..a0f1d01 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-footbridge/dc21285.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,16 @@
> PCI_STATUS_PARITY) << 16)
>
> extern int setup_arm_irq(int, struct irqaction *);
> -extern void pcibios_report_status(u_int status_mask, int warn);
> +extern void pcibios_report_bus_status(struct pci_bus *bus, u_int status_mask,
> + int warn);
> +
> +static struct pci_bus *dc21285_root_bus;
> +
> +static void pcibios_report_status(u_int status_mask, int warn)
> +{
> + if (dc21285_root_bus)
> + pcibios_report_bus_status(dc21285_root_bus, status_mask, warn);
> +}
>
> static unsigned long
> dc21285_base_address(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn)
> @@ -376,5 +385,6 @@ void __init dc21285_preinit(void)
>
> void __init dc21285_postinit(void)
> {
> + dc21285_root_bus = pci_get_next_root_bus(NULL);
It seems sort of ugly to scan the bus in pcibios_init_hw(), which
*returns* the struct pci_bus, then search for it here. Why can't
we just remember the bus we scanned?
It's also a little dubious that we only do pcibios_report_status()
for footbridge. That makes it look like it's debug code that might
not be necessary at all.
> register_isa_ports(DC21285_PCI_MEM, DC21285_PCI_IO, 0);
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
