On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2013/6/14 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> the 3) is about pci resource allocation? >> because pcibios_add_bus is called too early? > > (3) is https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56531 > >> If that is case, we should have something like attached patch for it. > > It does not even compile because the argument of pci_bus_add_devices() > points to a const struct. You can't increment a member of it. And even > if you remove the const from both the declaration and the definition > of that function, the patch doesn't help at all. > > Here is /proc/ioports with the fixed-up patch: dmesg with the fixed-up patch on v3.10-rc? After look at the your dmesg v3.10-rc5, we really should move pcibios_add_bus down. as we do have children slots under .... Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
