On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:30:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> All others are using "-" instead of "_".
>
> Who are "all others"? According to my grep it is 121 vs 44. So even without
> your two here we still 42 doing it the other way around so it is not all.
I mean in arch/x86
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:struct irq_chip ioapic_chip __read_mostly = {
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c- .name = "IO-APIC",
--
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:static struct irq_chip lapic_chip
__read_mostly = {
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c- .name = "local-APIC",
--
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:struct irq_chip msi_chip = {
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c- .name = "PCI-MSI",
--
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:static struct irq_chip dmar_msi_type = {
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c- .name = "DMAR_MSI",
--
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:struct irq_chip hpet_msi_type = {
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c- .name = "HPET_MSI",
--
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:static struct irq_chip ht_irq_chip = {
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c- .name = "PCI-HT",
--
arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c:struct irq_chip i8259A_chip = {
arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c- .name = "XT-PIC",
--
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c:static struct irq_chip lguest_irq_controller = {
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c- .name = "lguest",
--
arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c:static struct irq_chip uv_irq_chip = {
arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c- .name = "UV-CORE",
--
arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c:static struct irq_chip
cobalt_irq_type = {
arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c- .name = "Cobalt-APIC",
--
arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c:static struct irq_chip
piix4_master_irq_type = {
arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c- .name = "PIIX4-master",
--
arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c:static struct irq_chip
piix4_virtual_irq_type = {
arch/x86/platform/visws/visws_quirks.c- .name = "PIIX4-virtual",
--
>
> However it might make sense to use _ instead of " " within a chip's name and
> - as a delimiter for modes like edge or level. However that is way beyond the
> scope of this patch and I am not sure if anyone finds this usefull at all.
>
> Saying this, I am fine with this patch :)
ok.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
