On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:14:29AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Jason Cooper, > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:17:47 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > Please be aware that for-next is *not* stable. I rebuild it every time > > I pull new stuff in. It's much more helpful to list only the branches > > you need to build/test. > > Yes, I'm aware that for-next is not stable. Since the previous > iteration of this patch series generated a lot of discussion, I was > assuming there would be additional discussions on this new iteration, > and that it would certainly not be the final version. So for ease of > work, I've just based it on the branch that 'contains everything'. Ahh, ok, I've done the same. Thanks for the clarification. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
