Re: Resource assignment oddities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 18:31 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The possible (temporary) fix would be checking "local_fail_head" in function
>> __assign_resources_sorted() and don't do reassignment if all the element in
>> the list is IO related. In the future, we might introduce specific flag to
>> indicate the PCI host can't support IO and skip all IO assignment accordingly.
>
> Yinghai, what's the best we can do for 3.10 ? This kernel will go to enterprise
> distros I'm told and that's a pretty nasty problem for some of our machines
> that don't do IO.

ok, will look at that today.

will fix that from pci core side.

as later on x86 8 sockets and even 32 sockets system, will have more chance
that some root bus will not get io port allocation ...

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux