Hi Bjorn, I just noticed this commit (f39d5b72913e "PCI: Remove "extern" from function declarations") in the pci next branch. Just wondering why you would do such a thing. It is a lot of churn in quite a few header files and (in my opinion) goes the wrong way anyway. It may not actually make any difference to the compiler for functions, but for variables, it does. A variable declared in a header file without "extern" will effectively define it in every compilation that includes the header file, one with "extern" will only produce references. So, since, the global variables really should have the "extern", the functions are now inconsistent with that. It also means that when someone copies a function declaration to make a "static inline" stub, the "extern" is a big hint for them to remember to make the stub "static" - I have seen several occasions when this was not done and that causes compilation failures (but usually only in the configuration that the author did not bother to test). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpoyLNImMEsT.pgp
Description: PGP signature