Re: Apparent bug in pci_platform_power_transition() [drivers/pci/pci.c]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, April 12, 2013 10:12:32 PM Benenati, Chris J wrote:
> >On Thursday, April 11, 2013 11:13:49 PM Benenati, Chris J wrote:
> >> In 3.2, the marked lines (***) below were added:
> >> 
> >> static int pci_platform_power_transition(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
> >> {                               
> >>         int error;
> >> 
> >>         if (platform_pci_power_manageable(dev)) {
> >>                error = platform_pci_set_power_state(dev, state);
> >>                if (!error)            
> >>                        pci_update_current_state(dev, state);
> >>  ***           /* Fall back to PCI_D0 if native PM is not supported */
> >>  ***           if (!dev->pm_cap)
> >>  ***                   dev->current_state = PCI_D0;
> >>         } else {
> >>                error = -ENODEV;
> >>                /* Fall back to PCI_D0 if native PM is not supported */
> >>                if (!dev->pm_cap)
> >>                        dev->current_state = PCI_D0;
> >>         }
> >> 
> >>         return error;
> >> }
> >> 
> >> If the target state is PCI_D3, the new code serves to *undo* the marked code below executed by the preceding call to pci_update_current_state() when PCI PM registers are not present:
> >> 
> >> void pci_update_current_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state) 
> >> {
> >>     if (dev->pm_cap) {
> >>         u16 pmcsr;
> >> 
> >>         pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr);
> >>         dev->current_state = (pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK);
> >>     } else {
> >> ***     dev->current_state = state;
> >>     }
> >> }
> >> 
> >> This is despite the fact that platform_pci_power_manageable() indicated that the platform FW could handle it and the succeeding call to platform_pci_set_power_state() succeeded. That means that devices with FW support but no PCI PM support will be left in the wrong state.
> >> 
> >> It appears the new "if" statement should be "else if":
> >> 
> >>        if (!error)            
> >>                pci_update_current_state(dev, state);
> >>  ***   else if (!dev->pm_cap) /* Fall back to PCI_D0 if native PM is not supported */
> >>  ***           dev->current_state = PCI_D0;
> >> 
> >> Rafael concurs with me.
> >
> >Yes, I do.
> >
> >Are you willing to submit a patch fixing the problem (essentially the change you've proposed above), or do you want me to do that?
> >
> >Rafael
> 
> I have never submitted a patch and do not know the procedure, so would appreciate it if you would do it.  Thanks.

No problem, posted a while ago.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux