On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:42:57PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:17:23AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > I don't care whether the "if (irq_remap_broken)" test is in > > irq_remapping.c or intel_irq_remapping.c. The quirk itself, where we > > actually look at config space, is clearly Intel-specific, but there > > could easily be similar AMD quirks that could also set > > irq_remap_broken. In that case, it would make sense to have the test > > in the common code. > > > I've moved it to intel specific code for the time being, since it currently is > intel specific, its an easy move to put it in a common location if other vendors > have a need for it. > > I'm currently waiting on aproval to make the bz public, so that its inclusion in > the changelog is more than just an irritation when following the link results in > a 403 error. As soon as thats square, I'll post this again, CC-ing Jeorg and > Konrad. Thanks Neil. As long as this quirk is intel specific it should be in the intel-code. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
