On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 04:48:49 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 08:12:30 AM Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Sunday, March 10, 2013 10:05:16 PM Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> >> During merging pci tree with pm/acpi tree, Linus noticed that > >> >> we don't have same lock using patten about acpi pci root as > >> >> acpiphp. > >> >> > >> >> Here apply same lock patten, and we need to change > >> >> acpi_bus_hot_remove_device executing via acpi_os_hotplug_execute() > >> >> as it also hold the lock in acpi_bus_hot_remove_device. > >> >> > >> >> That will make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device calling the same as other > >> >> callers. > >> >> > >> >> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > Bjorn, this needs to go in before final 3.9. > >> > > >> > Are you going to handle it, or should I take care of it? > >> > >> It should be better via your pm+acpi tree, as that lock is added via your tree. > > > > OK, I'll take it, then, if Bjorn doesn't object. > > Yep, that's fine with me. Cool, thanks. :-) -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
