On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:33:03PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> It turns out that _Lxx control methods provided by some BIOSes clear
> the PME Status bit of PCI devices they handle, which means that
> pci_acpi_wake_dev() cannot really use that bit to check whether or
> not the device has signalled wakeup.
>
> For this reason, make pci_acpi_wake_dev() always attempt to resume
> the device it is called for regardless of the device's PME Status bit
> value (that bit still has to be cleared if set at this point,
> though).
>
> Reported-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Should this be marked for stable? I had this issue on 3.7 and 3.8 as
well.
Sarah
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -53,14 +53,15 @@ static void pci_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handl
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!pci_dev->pm_cap || !pci_dev->pme_support
> - || pci_check_pme_status(pci_dev)) {
> - if (pci_dev->pme_poll)
> - pci_dev->pme_poll = false;
> + /* Clear PME Status if set. */
> + if (pci_dev->pme_support)
> + pci_check_pme_status(pci_dev);
>
> - pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev);
> - pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
> - }
> + if (pci_dev->pme_poll)
> + pci_dev->pme_poll = false;
> +
> + pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev);
> + pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
>
> if (pci_dev->subordinate)
> pci_pme_wakeup_bus(pci_dev->subordinate);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
